LOOKING FOR AURA

Ewa Wróbel in her works refers to human, his nature, emotions and behavior from the very beginning. It is human and world created by him, what becomes a matter of subject and base for artistic activity of Wróbel. It is not realistic human world itself, what she is interested in, but its philosophies and psychological aspects, products of different origin, transformations, interactions... 'My aim is to take notice of some processes in surrounding world. [...] So far my concern has been people and their condition in contemporary world'.

January's exhibition in nova is a review of recent creative achievements of the artist, inspired by the thought of Walter Benjamin, German philosopher and theorist of culture, a groundbreaker in analyzing the mass aspect of culture. Ewa Wróbel raises Benjamin's question of meaning and influence of work of art, so called 'aura'. The statement that works of art, considered as classic, affect public mostly on a religious basis, is no longer valid nowadays. Artworks, reproduced on a mass scale, have lost their 'aura', have been stripped from exclusiveness, what in consequence, according to Benjamin, leads to the liberation of humanity.

Artist tries to find an answer for a question: 'What happens to this aura, does it vanish without the original artifact? Does it matter at all?' She starts from entitling the exhibition: 'Looking for aura...', then proceeds to attempts of proving in practice legitimacy (or its lack) of Benjamin's theory.  On gallery walls she hangs six oil pictures clashing them with different forms of reproduction (CD records, prints, slide show, memory game). Will it stimulate any reaction in a viewer, any thought? Does bigger aura come from original work or its transformations? ... 'In this matter I do not want to simply say YES or NO. I just provoke to ponder over the issue how work of art affects people, over the methods of copying, the condition of art and position of the artist...' – admits Ewa Wróbel.

 

The original paintings included in the exposition concern the issue of 'aura' itself. According to artist's explanation this word brings various connotations for her: 'blow of wind is: a mood, an atmosphere surrounding a person or a thing. Aura is immaterial colors and shapes surrounding people and objects'. For this reason on canvases are shown people close to the artist. Their portraits or rather drafts of their faces, reveal miscellaneous emotional states, different 'auras'.

Artist's comment.

The exhibition is going to be about painting, distribution, digitalization, looking for 'aura', which might be lost in reproduced works. The term comes from Walter Benjamin's essay: 'The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction'. According to Benjamin artworks lose their 'aura', and what is interesting, he finds the process positive, while I am not so sure... In postmodern age our contact with art has changed distinctly. We can visit Louvre, while wearing pajamas and on the computer screen observe, with a zoom, pores on Mona Lisa's face. Art is more accessible, reproduced in million samples. Is it good or is it wrong? I do not know... I meditate on aura, which emanate from original work. Could we find it in reproduction? Is it essential? What happened to, what happens to painting? Does mass distributing of art generate profit or lost? How does this ancient medium function in 21st century?

galeria nova

 

 

 

 

   

 

paintings

about me

contact

others